List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to AJP

Abstract

Volume 119 • Number 2

Summer 2006



 


Does stimulus appearance affect learning?

EMMANUEL M. POTHOS
University of Crete

NICK CHATER
University of Warwick

ELENI ZIORI
University of Ioannina


We examined the learning process with 3 sets of stimuli that have identical symbolic structure but differ in appearance (meaningless letter strings, arrangements of geometric shapes, and sequences of cities). One hypothesis is that the learning process aims to encode symbolic regularity in the same way, largely regardless of appearance. Another is that different types of stimuli bias the learning process to operate in different ways. Using the experimental paradigm of artificial grammar learning, we provided a preliminary test of these hypotheses. In Experiments 1 and 2 we measured performance in terms of grammaticality and found no difference across the 3 sets of stimuli. In Experiment 3 we analyzed performance in terms of both grammaticality and chunk strength. Again we found no differences in performance. Our tentative conclusion is that the learning process aims to encode symbolic regularity independent of stimulus appearance.

view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in American Journal of Psychology is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the American Journal of Psychology database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.


ISSN: 1939-8298


Terms and Conditions of Use